Loading...

Co-ownership of Intellectual Property Rights - The Complexities Unravelled

Level
Intermediate: Requires some prior subject knowledge
CPD
1.25 hours
Viewership
Access for entire organisation
Co-ownership of Intellectual Property Rights - The Complexities Unravelled

Available to view from 17 Jan 2025

With a SmartPlan £99

With a Season Ticket £198

Standard price £396

All prices exclude VAT

MBL Webinar Subscription

Gain 24/7 access to over 1,700 webinars.

Introduction

This webinar will look at intellectual property rights (‘IPR’) (specifically, patents, copyright, designs and trade marks) as legal assets that can be jointly owned/held by multiple parties or co-owners, the default rules that apply to such co-ownership arrangements in the absence of expressly agreed terms, and the advantages and disadvantages of those default rules versus express agreements.

Shared ownership of IPR can be a complex area for many reasons; the intangible nature of the property, the difficulties in quantifying the contributions made to a patentable invention or a copyright work by multiple inventors or authors, and of course conflicting opinions amongst the co-owners regarding the best way to commercialise and/or otherwise exploit the IPR post-creation.

What You Will Learn

This short webinar will cover the following:

  • How do co-ownership scenarios happen/arise for patents, copyright, designs and trade marks?
  • How does co-ownership work for patents?
    • What are the implied/statutory provisions on co-ownership of patents, copyright, designs and trade marks?
    • Express contractual terms
  • Advantages and disadvantages of relying on implied provisions for patents, copyright, designs and trade marks
  • The implications for unitary patents and the Unified Patent Court
  • General advantages and disadvantages of relying on implied provisions for IPR:
    • Automatic entitlement and protection
    • Statutory provisions mostly inadequate for commercial arrangements
  • Advantages of using an express co-ownership agreement:
    • Allows the parties to set out their preferred approach - may even be more appropriate for one party to take assignment of the IPR and then licence back to the now ex-co-owner
    • Exploitation of the IPR - licensing, in-house manufacture and sale of protected products etc
    • Prosecution and registration of the IPR where appropriate - i.e. patent application process, renewals, opposition proceedings
    • Approach to defence and enforcement - i.e. third-party challenges to validity and third-party infringements
    • Future development - i.e. further research using the protected invention in the case of patents

This pre-recorded webinar will be available to view from Friday 17th January 2025

Alternatively, you can gain access to this webinar and 1,700+ others via the MBL Webinar Subscription. Please email [email protected] for more details.

Co-ownership of Intellectual Property Rights - The Complexities Unravelled